The Street Fighter (imdb)
First a bit of background on how I saw this: there’s a new screening room in Greenville called West End Movies, where they screen “classics” for $3 a pop, coupled with a cartoon and “topical newsreel”. I got there just as the show was about to start, meaning that unless the info concerning future screenings is what they consider a “topical newsreel”, I missed that part. The cartoon ended up being a machinima made with World of Warcraft characters dancing to the extremely-overdone “Numa Numa Dance”. I have yet to see anything considered machinima that was anything but a waste of time, and this was no different.
Sonny Chiba is probably best-known to most outside of the realm of cult cinema for his cameo in Kill Bill despite the fact that he was a pretty big star in Japanese cinema and starred in all kinds of movies of wildly varying quality. The Street Fighter is fairly nonsensial plotwise, with the story mostly existing in order to get Sonny Chiba’s character from A to B to C with a number of fights in between. What stands out the most with the film is that cartoonish level of violence, which means that bad guys don’t just die, they’ll get their skulls cracked, fall to their death and end up lying in a requisite pool of brighly-colored blood, or even get their testicles ripped off. Probably the most refreshing part of the film apart from the violence is how nihilistic it all is, as Chiba’s Terry is far from a noble protagonist. The Street Fighter isn’t a great movie, but some of the outlandish violence may have been responsible for the even more insane violence in later entertainment like The Fist of the North Star and Riki-Oh, in which case its’ inspiration may be of more importance than the film taken at face value.
Back to the technical aspects, I wasn’t very impressed with the setup at West End Movies thus far. I wondered before I went whether or not they were showing DVDs or if they had actually tracked down prints for the films they were going to be showing (unlikely, but some of these are considered public domain). The Street Fighter was presented on DVD, but the DVD they used was from VCI, who aren’t exactly known for their stellar presentations, and I’m sure a more recent (and dirt cheap) BCI grindhouse double feature disc would have looked a lot better. This is assuming, of course, that things were properly set up. The overall image on everything shown was pretty blurry and looked as though the equipment hadn’t been set up properly or they weren’t even using a component or HDMI connection. The sound was also pretty muddy. The film was plenty loud in certain parts, but the dialogue was buried and hard to make out, though that problem may originate with the DVD used for the screening.
Who Can Kill A Child? (imdb)
I’ve wanted to see this since I first heard of it shortly before the DVD release, but only recently got around to actually watching it. The film starts out with an extremely heavy-handed documentary-style introduction that focuses on war and how many children have died in then-recent conflicts. This segment is pretty pointless and serves more as a distraction than an introduction. Then we get to the meat of the story, which concerns a British couple on holiday in Spain who decide to retreat to a small, sparsely inhabited island for the duration of their stay. From the moment they land, it’s apparent that something isn’t right, and there’s no one on the island save for the occasional creepy child. It’s a pretty slow film overall, and contains pretty minimal violence, though they do play up several scenes late in the movie for maximum impact. Overall, it’s fairly dull, which is a damning charge for a so-called “killer kid” movie, though the ending somewhat redeems a very slow start. The cinematography is pretty excellent in several spots, but that’s not enough to recommend it to any but those with more than a passing interest in eurocult cinema. As an aside, the wife in the movie is almost scarier than the children. I’ve never seen someone look more like a personification of skin cancer.
The Midnight Meat Train (imdb)
Perhaps the only thing more annoying than having read the book or story a film is based on before seeing it is having read it and only half-remembering it, leading to instances of thinking this or that is going to happen or that certain aspects weren’t present in the original work, but never being sure. That’s the situation I found myself in with this one. Ultimately, Midnight Meat Train is neither good nor bad, instead dwelling in the realm of mediocrity. There’s plentiful gore, and Vinnie Jones is great as the antagonist, but the main pitfalls of most modern horror also plagues MMT, and that’s a vanilla protagonist and a tenuous love story. It’s worth a watch if you’re a fan of the director or Clive Barker, but as a decided non-fan in general of the new breed of largely made-for-teens “Lionsgate horror”, I doubt it will do much for anyone else.
Edmond (imdb)
There’s been somewhat of a trend lately for directors who cut their teeth on mostly genre fare to begin working outside the confines of what had up until that point defined their career. David Cronenberg is perhaps the most noted example of this, what with his recent fixation on crime, but Stuart Gordon makes a pretty decisive turn away from the horror films and Lovecraft adaptations he’s been known for with Edmond. The synopsis provided on the back of the case is at first frustratingly vague, but once you’ve seen the film, you realize it would be hard to say much more about the film without turning away more potential viewers than you would likely draw in. The plot centers around Edmond (William H. Macy), an businessman who has just left his wife and begins a series of horrendously unsuccessful ventures into New York City’s underworld and reaps what he sows when things quickly spiral out of control. The story explores themes of racism, fate, and the downsides of supposed civilization both subtly and with the impact of a fist to the face. Macy holds the film together with a performance that ranges from subdued to frenzied, sometimes changing from one to the other in a matter of seconds. Also appearing are a slew of Gordon’s regulars (both new and old) like George Wendt, Mena Suvari, and Jeffrey Combs, who I’m embarrassed to say I didn’t initially recognize. While I’m hesitant to say that Edmond is as good as Cronenberg’s History of Violence or Eastern Promises, it is a fascinating film that more than equals the sum of its parts.
Gumby: The Movie (imdb)
I vaguely remember liking Gumby when he made a minor comeback in the mid-90s, but what I’ve seen lately makes me appreciate Art Clokey’s ‘little clay boy’ even more. More than any other childrens character I can name, Gumby and the world he inhabits is surreal, and in such a way that it’s hard to say that the creators are even aware of the eccentricity of their creation. Gumby: The Movie (or “Gumby 1” as it’s referred to onscreen) apparently had the misfortune of coming out around the same time as Toy Story, and while the Clokey’s clay creations have endured decades and entertained millions, it seems safe to say that pretty much everyone going up against the massive might of Disney’s marketing has found themselves lingering in the shadow of the Mouse. It’s a real shame with Gumby, because it’s quirky and imaginative enough to keep even the most ADD-afflicted brat interested for its roughly 80-minute runtime. The plot sounds like some sort of LSD dream, and for all I know it may well have been. When Gumby and his band the Clayboys play, Gumby’s dog Lowbelly cries and his tears turn into pearls. When Gumby’s nemeses the Blockheads figure this out, they kidnap Lowbelly, creating a robot replica which they return to an unsuspecting Gumby. From there we get a robot replica of Gumby and his band and all sorts of weirdness that culminates in a Farm Aid-style benefit concert. It’s a very strange concoction that never goes where it’s expected to and never second-guesses itself. The music used in the film is rather odd for kid’s movie, as it’s largely comprised of the progressive guitar rock you might hear being played poorly by some nerd at Guitar Center on a Saturday afternoon, and the songs with vocals are cheesy in a “how did they let this out of the studio?” kind of way. To top it all off, at the end of the credits, the film is dedicated to Sri Sathya Sai Baba, an controversial Indian guru probably best known to the Western world for the Nag Champa incense bearing his name. It’s a wild experience that’s immensely enjoyable so long as your tolerance for strangeness is fairly high.

